RockstarMarkets
All news
Markets · Narrative··Updated 2d ago
Part of: Iran Oil Shock

Fed Rate-Cut Expectations Pushed to Late 2026 on Inflation Resilience

Goldman Sachs and Bank of America have both delayed their Fed rate-cut forecasts to December 2026 and March 2027 respectively, citing elevated energy prices and persistent inflation. Central banks globally are adopting a wait-and-see posture as supply shocks complicate the inflation narrative.

R
Rocky AI · RockstarMarkets desk
Synthesised from 8 wires · 0 mentions in the last 24h
Sentiment
-35
Momentum
85
Mentions · 24h
0
Articles · 24h
42
Affected sectors
Related markets

Key facts

  • Goldman Sachs delays first Fed cut from June to December 2026
  • Bank of America pushes cuts to March 2027; cites jobs and energy inflation
  • Elevated energy prices cited as 'last straw' keeping inflation above Fed targets
  • 10-week Middle East conflict driving oil, creating supply shock
  • Central banks globally in wait-and-see mode; no imminent easing expected

What's happening

The most significant macro repricing in weeks occurred on May 11 as two mega-bank forecasters postponed Fed rate-cut timelines. Goldman Sachs moved its first cut from June to December 2026, explicitly citing 10-week Middle East conflict impacts on oil markets and elevated energy prices keeping inflation elevated. Bank of America similarly delayed cuts, joining a growing Wall Street consensus that the Fed will remain on hold well into H2 2026. This marks a meaningful reset from the late-April narrative when rate-cut bets were clustering in Q2-Q3 timeframes.

The fundamental driver is energy supply disruption, not demand-side inflation. Oil prices surging from the Hormuz closure create a direct mechanical drag on consumer purchasing power and producer margins alike, while central banks face a dilemma: lower rates to support growth (given delayed capex and widening credit spreads), or hold firm to anchor inflation expectations. The Fed's May FOMC decision is unlikely to move, but forward guidance could tip dovish or hawkish depending on energy trajectory assumptions. Goldman and BofA are betting on persistence, not transience, of the oil shock.

Central banks globally are adopting "wait-and-see" positioning. The Bank of England, ECB, and Federal Reserve have collectively signalled no imminent moves. The BOE in particular faces a supply-side shock (oil, Middle East disruption) without the fiscal transfer mechanisms available to the Fed, complicating its dual mandate. Market pricing for rate cuts has flattened; two-year Treasury yields have stabilized, while longer-duration bonds rally modestly on recession fears offsetting inflation concerns.

The market debate hinges on ceasefire timeline. If US-Iran tensions ease in weeks, oil prices could collapse and rate-cut expectations resurface. If Hormuz remains effectively shut through Q3 2026, the Fed will hold rates steady and investors face a stagflationary squeeze: slower growth, higher input costs, unchanged borrowing costs. For now, the pain trade is long duration and short equities, though earnings resilience thus far has capped downside.

What to watch next

  • 01May 2026 CPI data release (US inflation report)
  • 02Fed FOMC statement and forward guidance; inflation expectations language
  • 03Oil price trajectory; any Middle East ceasefire announcement
Mention velocity · last 24 hours
Coverage from these sources
Previously on this story

Related coverage

More about $GSPC

Topic hub
Iran Oil Shock: Tracking the Middle East Supply Risk Trade

Live coverage of the Iran conflict, Persian Gulf oil supply disruption, OPEC reaction and the cross-asset trades pricing it.