RockstarMarkets
All guides
Learn · narratives· 4 min read

How to use the Source Agreement matrix

What the source agreement matrix at /trends/media shows, how the consensus percentage is calculated, and how traders read high-agreement versus low-agreement narratives differently.

TL;DR

Source agreement counts how many tier-1 outlets are covering the same narrative. High agreement (5+ of 8) means consensus. Low agreement (1-2) means an early or contested story. Both have trades attached.

The source agreement matrix shows, for each live market narrative, which of the eight tier-1 outlets we track has filed coverage on it. The outlets are Bloomberg, Reuters, FT, WSJ, CNBC, Axios, MarketWatch and Yahoo. The matrix is at /trends/media.

The consensus column is a simple fraction: how many of those 8 outlets have at least one published wire on the narrative in our index. A consensus of 100% (8/8) means every tier-1 desk is writing the same story. A consensus of 25% (2/8) means it is early, or contested, or both.

How to use it: high-consensus narratives (>60%) are usually fully priced in. The trade is rarely in being long the story — it is in being on the right side of the inevitable mean-revert when the narrative goes stale. Watch for the velocity to peak; when it starts dropping while consensus is still high, you are at the top of the curve.

Low-consensus narratives (<40%) are where the asymmetric trades live. If only Bloomberg and FT are covering a story but the mention velocity is exploding on social, you have a window of 24-72 hours before the rest of the wires catch up and the move becomes consensus. The classic example: the August 2024 yen-carry unwind started as a Reuters Japan story before any English-language desk was paying attention.

The matrix also exposes editorial divergence. When two tier-1 outlets land on the same story but our sentiment data shows they disagree on direction (Bloomberg bullish, FT bearish), that is information. Divergence at the top of the stack rarely lasts; one of them will move within a few days.

People also ask

Why these 8 outlets and not more?
Bloomberg, Reuters, FT, WSJ, CNBC, Axios, MarketWatch and Yahoo are the desks whose coverage moves prices fastest in our experience. Adding more outlets dilutes the consensus signal without adding much information.
Does first-publish (which outlet broke it) matter?
Less than you'd think. RSS feeds poll at different cadences and our timestamp can be off by minutes. We deliberately do not show 'lead source' because we cannot attribute it reliably.
How often does the matrix update?
It re-renders every 60 seconds on /trends/media. Underlying narrative coverage updates each time the narratives cron runs (every 15 minutes).

More from Learn